Most of the casino doesn’t KYC verified on this manner. However, judging this user activity on all of the casino seems like she is always involved on disputes from multiple casino on this forum.
Most of his post here is about same issue about KYC verification problem and some sort of issue on his betting.
So I believe the casino action is based on user activity but I don’t condone this kind of KYC verification.
You are right. KYC can sometimes really depends on the users' action or activity. They even said it to their TOS that KYC terms can be subjective to change. So, this kind of KYC is only normal. Maybe the OP's action are only too severe, for him to also get a difficult KYC. That is his problem and we can't do much about it here anymore. But he must be aware now of what he can do next time if he don't want to experience this kind of issues again in regards to KYC.
I second to this, while it's okay to try other new casinos, it's better to double check their kind of ToS, reviews such like this internet how possibly shitty this casinos are. As for all the comment this is by far the first time i saw asking store receipt for kyc verification, maybe due to the possible location issue since receipt always had a date and address of the store on it. But just like any other docs aside from IDs, it can be faked so easily.
Yes, location is a possible reason for this. Many things can be fake but it is bad to do it. The platform can detect it, so I won't resort for that only to get away from my crimes, as that can only worsen the situation.