Funny coming from Saylor - even though surely he is correct that the power of bitcoin is that individuals hold it, to the extent that the collective "us" have not lost our keys.
One of the few times I got rugged because of nyknyc. I almost never left coins on an exchange, but I had some sitting in btce when they were shut down.
I take that back feds. I'm just making shit up...

Wow. I wonder if he is going to open back up and give us back our coins? I lost some too at the time of the shutdown... and it was not the ONLY time I lost coins. Remember they switched domain names like 3-4 times before the shut down became final?
OK I feel a soapbox moment coming on... JJG is gonna batslap me. But some batslaps are worth it.
You are one sick puppy.
#justsayingBitcoin is the deal. We all know that. But privacy/fungability is a MAJOR MAJOR issue. And the religious maxi types will just mock/block you if you mention that not only is it a problem but it is STILL a problem in 2025!!! But MONERO is really the only solution. Still. STILL.
I don't buy shit off the darknet markets. But if I did. I WOULD NOT USE BTC IN ANY FORM. Monero ONLY in that case.
I don't claim to be technical enough or to even know the exact privacy trade-offs, but I thought that lightning network was pretty good in the privacy realm - ie difficulties to trace..and sure maybe it depends on which wallets are being used, and/or what nodes might be the first hops.
The point is... it is not good enough to risk that sort of security scenario. So.. it is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. Yet.
Bitcoin needs to implement Monero level privacy on it's payment layers.
I wonder if you are technical enough to be making these claims. You make sound as if bitcoin is broken. I recall hearing a podcast of a lightning developer recently, but I have to remember from where I heard it.... .let me search... or think about it.... Ok. I found it.
Bitcoin Takeover Podcast with Super Testnet as guest: Monero vs Lightning Network PrivacyI only listened to the podcast once, and I was doing something else but it seemed that Super Testnet was making some decently good points about lightning network being superior to Monero in various privacy ways and even though the podcast is 2.5 hours, they start out talking about lightning versus monero... the Overcast App also breaks down the times in which each topic was discussed
The satanic information gobbling corporate layers are doing GREAT with their ETFs. (This is why I wrote here about ETFs being a double edged sword.) And there will be other info gobbling banks coming along ASAP I am sure. And great! Most people are probably OK with their info being... ... gobbled.
Of course, ETFs, banks and other third party custodial are going to provide difficulties, and perhaps even destroy bitcoin's whole peer to peer value proposition.
Pant... pant... ok I am a little too worked up.
Here's the thing...
TIME is valuable. (we only have so much)
EFFORT is valuable. (we can only DO so much)
PRIVACY is valuable. (If you can see everything I do then it changes what I can do, and how I can do it.)
Bitcoin OWNS the first two.
WE HAVE to take the third one. And we have to take it above the base layer.
You have that bitcoin is broken theme going on with your post, just like the good ole days when you were doing those kinds of things in 2017 about bitcoin being broken and the need for big blocks....blah blah blah.. and we know how that went... early panic. or overly panic by too much too soon..
I wish I was a developer... But... I am retarded.
I am retarded too.. and Gachapin too, according to the description below his avatar..
Why aqua? People criticize them for lack of privacy and their fees... I have downloaded Aqua but I have not started to use it. I thought
Cake was pretty good in terms of starting out its life supporting Monero, but they also added bitcoin (apparently silent payments, whatever the fuck that means?) and some other altcoins, but the Cake folks seem to have more privacy orientation than the Aqua folks, not that I know much about these matters, either.