Re: Most valuable thread for this forum's future.
Ok, now I am getting (50-60%), why he thinks that I am licking ass 
.
So, nutildah and icopress distrust me and mv1986, charles-Tim and DaveF trust me...
. So, nutildah and icopress distrust me and mv1986, charles-Tim and DaveF trust me...
That was a suggestion and if you reread it you will see that it is a rhetorical question, not that I am absolutely claiming that you are licking his ass because he distrust you. But yes, feedback is one thing and trust lists are another.
Whether it's because of that or not it still sounds the same to me.
Being against AI today is like being against the internet in 2000 or being against bitcoin in 2015. And this forum was born on the internet and for bitcoin.
Its not his fault as he doesn't even have a trust list. I'm just not a fan of accounts less than a year old being on DT. It should take much longer for one to prove themselves and their intentions than that. Not his fault he was added to DT2, though.
In fact I have reviewed his feedback (they are ‘aggressive’, my style) and if I have not added him to my trust list it is for the two reasons you mention, that this account has not been on the forum for long and that he does not have a trust list.
I use AI "legitimately" all the time, and even get merits for it. There's no need for debate: just give AI credit where its due so as not to misrepresent yourself and your abilities. Really doesn't seem like too much to ask, IMHO.
The essence of a forum is debate, and in the same way I, who am for a positive approach to AI, have also tagged AI spammers and reported them in your thread. I guess we have a similar stance but from different points of view.