I simply asked publicly if the distrust would have something to do with this thread and on the latter comment I repeated that regardless of your knowledge of the trust system the thread still sounds the same to me.
You did not just simply ask 
. There was a tone of rudeness, which at that time I took funnily, but now I think you accused me of manipulating the trust system, which I think is not fair.If you want it any other way I see it as unnecessary praise of nutildah's thread.
I am glad that you reviewed your tone. You can think whatever you want, but when you accuse someone, a little more responsible explanation is expected from a wise and reputed member like you.You seriously expect to convince someone that tagging people for using AI when all they do is copy what the AI says without quoting it is anything special? I do it myself and it has nothing of magical microscopic detail.
Again, you are the one who thinks it is magic, I never used that word. The whole point of my thread is that it is becoming more difficult to detect AI content. You must be catching noob AI spammers, that is why you think it is easy. Most of the time, seasoned AI spammers are using humanizers and intentional errors, which is why you need to look at microscopic details, which means attention to small changes/things, not just copy-pasting them on AI detectors. We have numerous examples where this has happened. Recently as well, when I tagged one AI spammer he made an excuse that he is using Grammarly, and since I always give reports from 3 detectors (only 2 are required as per thread), I gave him a chance to file a reply. He did not reply because he knows that I have gone through his post histories and can prove that he is using humanizers.All I am saying is that we need continuous upgradation which will come if more and more users will be attracted towards the thread.
Now look at you comment,
Being against AI today is like being against the internet in 2000 or being against bitcoin in 2015. And this forum was born on the internet and for bitcoin.
You realize, how basic, generic, and totally straw-manned it is . When I asked specifically what are your objections? You replied,
what you ask I made it clear in my first comment:
Now let's see your first comment (I removed ass licking part as I do not think you were referring to that, but just in case let me know
)While you and many worry about how to ban the use of AI, AI is already bringing about a revolution like the internet in the world out there.
To me the debate should focus on how to legitimately use AI in this forum so that it doesn't remain a cave of Australopithecus while the world moves forward but that doesn't seem to be on the table.
Again, basic, generic, and totally straw-manned.To me the debate should focus on how to legitimately use AI in this forum so that it doesn't remain a cave of Australopithecus while the world moves forward but that doesn't seem to be on the table.
So my objection is that your main thesis, the one you put in the title, is false,
That is a valid objection. I have to use IMHO in my title, from now on. But if you read the very first word of my post it is, ''IMO''. And if you had looked a little more carefully you might have found, ''as of now'' as well. But here I admit my mistake.
Are you afraid of AI in medicine? If it scares you in a forum it should scare you even more in health matters, and for some years now doctors have been using AI to suggest possible diagnoses or patterns when you explain the symptoms and write them in the computer. Although the final decision is up to them.
Again you are straw-manning my argument. I have clearly said,I am not against AI but against those who mindlessly post AI garbage which is very dangerous to consume.
And please be specific. Here members need to develop their comprehension which is hammered by AI. How do you know if what AI is telling you is good for you without developing sound comprehension and analytical skills?I am sure in medicine (or any other field) professionals do not blindly trust AI. You can use AI to give medicine but before that, you have to have an MBBS degree, a license, and enough experience to asses the application properly. The same analogy is applicable here, noobs can not post AI garbage.
I would not be surprised if you are an alt account in the end of everything
GTFO.