If you can back up your claim that the game fairness system is rigged then you should provide solid evidence that even an arbitrator like Casinoguru will be convinced.
I stand by my claim, and here's the hard truth: I’ve been requesting full access to my betting data from Stake for the past 147 days under GDPR—data that would expose the true nature of their "provably fair" system. Despite my repeated, compliant requests, Stake has refused to provide this critical information.
This refusal isn’t a technical glitch—it’s a deliberate act of opacity that undermines any claim of fairness. Without access to the complete, unaltered records, even an independent arbitrator like Casinoguru would be left in the dark. The very act of withholding data speaks volumes: it’s proof that something is seriously amiss.
Until Stake complies, the evidence of their rigged system remains in plain sight. The lack of transparency and blatant non-compliance is the strongest evidence we have, and it only reinforces my claims.
Then why not Casinoguru request it to the casino instead of you if you have a lead that the Stake games really have a problem with their provably fair system because they will surely entertain you due to risk involved since Stake has a lot of customer.
IIRC Stake already mention that they already provided you data for your overall bets. I’m not really good technical aspect of the provably fair system.