Secondly, some of us have been arguing on this before time, but I want us to go wide on this discussion using different approaches over it, which may includes the religious, political, economical and social believes to why Clergy men should gamble or not, lets sight examples where necessary, prove our point and learn from each other's opinion.
In my honest opinion, I'll say clergymen shouldn't gamble, not because it's bad if they do, but it would really look ugly if they get into a mess owing to their involvement. There's always a big temptation that every gambler withstands to gamble responsibly, and sometimes emotionally, a gambler might be unstable and still manage to attend church, now let's imagine if it's the clergyman that's emotionally drained as a gambler and he still has a church to pastor, we know how badly he'll likely perform.
It's very good for clergymen and leaders to always be emotionally prepared to discharge their duties and having to gamble might give the clergyman some distraction and emotional instability which isn't very good for his work.