The thread has more than 150 posts, I'm not reading all of them. I'm just addressing your initial complaint, which on its face sounds completely fabricated. And since your account was deleted, its impossible to verify your claims.
Here's what it comes down to:
Will check aswell for under 8449 (15.5% chance on the other side) but I'm guessing it will be something similar, which is not even close to the 158 losing streak he claims.
I just checked it too and can confirm the numbers you gave are correct.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on
under 1550, the longest losing streak is 41, from roll number 12 to roll number 51.
- For bets with 15.5% win chance on
over 8449, the longest losing streak is 57, from roll number 5074 to roll number 5130.
So you're claiming that for whatever reason the outcome of the bets you made wasn't calculated according to DuckDice's system of provably fair. Unfortunately, there's no way to verify that claim if we don't know what the bets are.
I will remove your negative trust but have opposed your flag as its not based on anything tangible.
Edit: please don't think this means I will consider supporting your argument; as a matter of fact, this is my last post in this thread.
I will break the 150 posts down into a single relevant one, while we couldn't find in our database anymore user OP's bets, OP at some point posted a screenshot here, from which we identified the server seed/client seed, in our database, while those bets couldn't be linked to an account ( OPs account) we could see what % they were played on, bet amounts, results if they were won or lost. Basically a server/client seed combination is unique to each player, and while OP was the one who provided the screenshot of the bet, it was also confirmation that indeed they were his bets. OP has not played on the 15.5% chance, ( he played 33% chance) OP has not encountered a 158 losing streak, and we have proof of this, thus the request for him to submit his complain to AG so we can provide it. OP has been beating around the bush (he perfectly knows this, thus why he for the past 3 weeks is completely ignoring this aspect, and submitted an what I assume GDPR related, probably fake, AG complaint).
So what I'm trying to portray is that, we have solid evidence that will disprove everything OP has stated on this thread, we just needed it to be handled by a verified mediator (aka AskGamblers).
And yes, OP is the blackmailer, judging also from the fact that he started this off with completely fabricated facts, us receiving blackmail emails, its pretty clear what he was going after.
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.