I like the claim that the op committed fraud justifies the confiscation of all the op's funds. yet they offer zero proof that he did fraud.
So basically they claim if you win and we say fraud you lose.
At the op sorry for your loss.
at betpanda shame on you.
Thank you for your message, that’s exactly the issue—they accused me of fraud without presenting a single piece of evidence. If they actually had proof, they would have provided it to AskGamblers when requested. Instead, they just keep repeating the same vague excuses.
So yes, as you said, their logic is simple: "
If you win and we say fraud, you lose." That’s not how a legitimate bookmaker should operate.
Again, I really appreciate your words. Seeing support from trusted members like you confirms that I’m not the only one who finds this situation completely unacceptable.
Dude believe it or not you can gain from this and pick better places to bet.. In fact If I were you I would pick my next casino and specifically ask them their fraud policy in an email refer them to this thread. Tell them you want to play but that you will not join them if they do not agree to state the exact reasons they can ban you and that they must offer evidence of some sort to ban you. so far I see the casino's answers and I see zero evidence of any kind from them.
I would never use a casino that say we do not offer evidence of fraud but we think you cheated and won't pay you.
And I know a shit ton about betting with racetracks and casinos on multiple continents .
They need to have some evidence if they want to ban you and basically fine you (taking your deposit is a fine)