Yes, or would you like to create a thread with the help of an AI while i crack my brain to respond to you? Never!
Glad you know that's cheating, and I do not think a reputable forum like Bitcointalk will ever allow its members to flood the forum with AI-generated posts. Many shitposters would rather prefer to make posts with AI and reply with AI. We all would miss the Bitcointalk forum if that ever becomes the case.
I don't think anyone wants to see the forum flooded with AI generated posts, simply because it's an easier resource to access than intelligent thinking, and it will degrade the forum further. However, there is nothing wrong with using AI to help you write your post. Let me use an example:
I saw someone write recently about new forum development being a waste from day one because everyone has switched over to mobile. I know that's not true, but I can either reply "nuh uh, you're an idiot" or I can waste time researching just how many people have switched over, OR I can ask AI and get the answer, which I can write in my own words. Surprise! I've been using AI to respond to stupid posts for some time, but I have never felt the need to copy/paste what it generated verbatim.
I reject the scammer mentality above of cheating if you don't get caught, and suggest simple rules. Something like content generated by an AI must be in a quote with the source. This way it cannot be used in a signature campaign. So to response to the questionable stat of mobile use, DS says only 58 percent access via mobile, and tablet 3 percent.
