Great question! The Web2 vs. Web3 gaming debate really comes down to ownership, transparency, and player-driven economies—but you’re right, if those don’t solve real problems, then Web3 games won’t take off.

Problems in Modern Gaming (Web2)

• You don’t own in-game assets – If a game shuts down or bans you, your items, skins, and currencies are gone.

• Centralized control – Devs decide everything. A patch or update can devalue your in-game progress overnight.

• No real interoperability – You can’t transfer items between different games. Your Fortnite skins stay in Fortnite.

• Pay-to-Win & Microtransactions – Game companies profit by selling in-game items, but players don’t get real value back.

How Web3 Solves This

✅ True ownership – NFTs & tokens let players actually own their in-game assets, which can be traded or sold.
✅ Decentralized economies – Players, not just game devs, can drive in-game markets. Think of how CSGO skins have real-world value, but fully player-controlled.
✅ Interoperability – In theory, Web3 assets could work across multiple games (though we’re not fully there yet).
✅ Provable fairness – Gambling & gaming can be more transparent with blockchain verifying every action and transaction.

But You’re Right—Web3 Alone Won’t Make a Game Good
--snip--