Be informed that this is a general discussion, not a threat to take attacks on each other, drop your own perspective and state some reasons to back them up, let's make it more of being fun and informative with our actual facts.
My thought on this is that its not bad gambling for just a gambler but for a religious person or better still a clergyman I think it's bad to do so basically it's based on their beliefs and religious and mostly it's against their faith, so it's not advisable for them to gamble cause it spoils their reputation. But in the other way round I think have come across some clergymen that gambles but I really don't have a close reasons of why they do so but I feel everyone in life have flaws and they would always fall for something so balancing believes and religion to gambling can be very tempting.
For those who religious will not agree with gambling because that is prohibit in their religion. So they will not tolerate to those who playing gambling and will not accept the money too. They think that will be the same as they gambling if they accept the money because the source of the money come from gambling.
It is better those who gamble not telling to other people especially giving their win money to those people who religious. They will not like to hear about that and will say many things to that person.
Yes, but I think we cannot exclude the idea that there are always some hypocrites who, for example, engage in gambling even though they know that their religion strictly forbids such activity, and regarding the issue of accepting money, I think it depends on whether they know that the money is earned from gambling or not, because if the giver does not say it at all or even lies, then surely people who have a religion that forbids gambling will also most likely accept the money, but the case is almost the same as above in the sense that there are always hypocrites who are likely to accept the money even though they are told that it is the result of gambling.