what I suggested to be shared, either publicly or through private eyes, were the instruction from their provider to initiate the action against OP, to prove that it is indeed the provider's request instead of WE88 abusing their ToS and ban players as they wished.
Still in the end, the user will try to ask how you can catch it and @OP or the user can claim denied that allegation + demand how they can detect the user being used for robots or arbitrage. This is why, sportsbet case is always a never-ending case (unless the case is about multi-account, abused promotion or avoiding limits by creating bunch of account).
- On the other hand, a casino can follow your request (while the provider are the one who notify/alert the casino).
- But in other side, the user or OP can denied those allegation no matter is from casino or provider + demands how they can caught him or detect his account to be marked as arbitrage or.
Plus, If you agree with the casino the @OP or user can just tell you. You're taking side with the casino.