I second this. This is a really good suggestion that will not only boost the credibility of the casino in question's claim but also remove a big part of the doubt. You (the casino in question) have to do this otherwise, there will be more reasons that you cant be trusted.
BK8 doing these for someone faked the KYC and sent to holydarkness
IMO, casino could share information like the list of multi-accounts, faked documents, IP access to some trusted member like DT. But, for how the provider caught some arbitrage stuff or these... I really doubt they will share how they caught the user. The reason: can be used for a loophole to avoid detection by the user.
This could be reason, why CG (Casino Guru) doesn't want to handle any Sportbet case. It's just to complicated, perhaps you can also try to search up any sportbet case regarding robots, or arbitrage. Did the casino share how they detect those... In my experience reading sportbet case, not a single casino want to share it.
More excuses, more you siding with bookies stealing money because you don't understand how betting works and you're just yapping.
Genuinely the way your brain works is insane.