The forum administration has nothing to do with the topic and moderators cannot intervene unless there is a violation of one of the forum rules. The trust system is the community's means of warning against fraud and scamming schemes.
The decision to ban mix-ers' activities does not only concern suspicious services but also includes all activities related to them. Trading platforms and mi-xing platforms cannot be compared in this regard.
I think they can be considered running illegal services, and advertising illegal services is against the forum rules. Why are they trying to rename the service with the same old name?
A similar thing is with CoinBlinker.com, which is now redirected to CoinBlinker.me
The strange thing is that the domain was not seized.
I don't know if it is one of the forum rules not to launch prohibited services since the ban policies differ from one legislation to another. Mixer services are not illegal according to a clear legal text and their use alone does not warrant punishment unless involvement in suspicious activities is proven, but they cannot all be convicted of the same charge. The forum administration decided to ban all mi-xer content as a protective measure and not because someone asked them to do so because they are considered illegal. Mix-ers use other platforms for advertising. I will agree with the admins if they decide to take precautionary measures against any type of services that could threaten the forum's reputation, but without that limiting the freedom of users. The trust system on the forum plays an important role in balancing freedom of expression and publication, and not getting involved in promoting illegal services of any kind.