~
Yes, the easiest round for the favorites. I caught a multi-bet Real with a handicap of -1.25, Barcelona with a handicap of -1.5 and Atletico plain win with odds of about 2.0 + a few other games, the overall odds are ~13. I don't know why the bookmakers were so generous with Atletico but I'm not complaining
I don't know why the bookies do that and I don't know why the board here was so biased like they were expecting every single favorite to lose.
And I still can't hold my laughs as some claim Barca beating Palmas (17th and 1 point in 5 matches) 2-0 was proof they are the best while Real beating Girano (12th and 3 points in 5 matches) 2-0 was proof they're struggling.
Sometimes this is more like 100% fan talk than actually looking at the odds and betting overall.
Girona have a long streak of dry defeats against Real, so this pick was logical.
But WTF, what kind of multi-bet is this?!
It just seems to me that if Real scores a goal first (second option) and Girona doesn't score a goal (third option), then this means an automatic victory for Real (first option). But in this case, the first option is simply unnecessary and if it increases the odds, then this is a clear mistake by the bookmaker.
The odds increase, but so do the chances of losing. But WTF, what kind of multi-bet is this?!
It just seems to me that if Real scores a goal first (second option) and Girona doesn't score a goal (third option), then this means an automatic victory for Real (first option). But in this case, the first option is simply unnecessary and if it increases the odds, then this is a clear mistake by the bookmaker.
No they don't!
If bet 2 wins means Real scored, if bet 3 wins means Girona hasn't scored a goal, the automatically bet 1 is a winner.
I'm really curious how was this possible as you can't even select multiple options from the same event.