.................................
Although their defence was very dilapidated in the match but the absence of haaland also had an impact on the sharpness of their attacking line, throughout the match their only relied on the two wings to dismantle liverpool defence, but when the ball was passed into the middle it was foden who became the main striker unable to complete existing opportunities well and I think that it would be different if haaland was the main striker, But apart from that, manchester city overall play has improved although guardiola does have to evaluate their defence, especially since their defensive problems are quite complex including lack of organisation, inconsistency and also poor chemistry between players after Stones and Akanji were injured.
The absence of Erling Haaland in the match was really felt, so that the efficiency and final finishing done by Manchester City in the match was quite bad. As for Foden, who tried several times to break through Liverpool's goal, but unfortunately on several occasions he got it, the kicks he did were considered too weak to be able to tear through the goal guarded by Allison. On the other hand, the pressing done by Manchester City's forwards was also considered weak, so that Liverpool's defense was unshakeable. TAA and Van Djik really appeared solid in guarding Liverpool's defense so that it was quite difficult for Man City players to break through Liverpool's defense.