Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Holydarkness and Casino Disputes—Something’s Fishy
by
holydarkness
on 25/02/2025, 18:02:12 UTC
⭐ Merited by albon (2)
It’s been a while since I joined this forum. I have been watching Holydarkness how he jumps into  cases against casinos and defend them.

at first I thought it is just in my case, but I have noticed a pattern, when someone’s raise voice against a casino specially against BC.Game.io holydarkness will step in and suddenly it feels like the casino is on right side and the OP is scammer.

It's bc.game, bc.game.io was not part of their mirror sites,



When holydarkness get involved in a case that’s basically a casino win. Casino will stop responding to the thread as holydarkness took over it now, and casino will continue it with holydarkness in private.

Been like that for a while; they stopped responding. Their support account only being active again [I guess they assign it to other coworker who handle it better] recently. Before that, it was me who informed, pushed, and chased BC to get things moving until things are resolved and the player told me [or I told the forum through a post on the thread] that their situation got cleared.

About basically the casino win... well, wow, I must have done a very poor job to ensure that, given at most cases, if the players were not found guilty, I managed to push BC to pay. For example:

BC v. Azasapos, 350,000 USD
BC v. Mikaela13, 7,800 USD
BC v. Neymar5, 14,000 USD
BC v. CBGAM, 13,000 USD

And let's not forget one of the most epic case in SA board, though I'll have to say I don't really remember how huge of the effort I poured in that case and how active the player in chasing the resolution from his side, BC v. justincase78, 7,000,000 USD

So... the casino win? By having to pay those [subjectively] significant amount of fund? You have a very weird description of "win".

Or were you referring the winning from cases where the players are caught doing abusive behavior, that --at times-- not only proven here, but also by ADR? Is it fair to call it a winning because I got involved? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to call it that facts got unearthed and things get resolved by evidences? Where I only help get to the bottom of the case and revealing the truth?

[DuckDice issue]

Will skip as it's been beyond exhaustively explained throughout several threads OP have, to the point that I got tired and just watch OP... well, do things with the marbles that he have.

If he got these private lines, why are we even bothering bitcointalk? Isn’t the point of bringing a case to this forum is to things out in open? Why don’t he message them and say Hey, this issue is raised against you and respond or….  And if the casino doesn’t take it seriously the community should back the user until the casino take it serious. But it will be all behind the forum and the casino get a free pass.

They can, I didn't prohibit them to address things directly by themselves. They just didn't do that. Why? I don't know. Besides, is there any need to force them to address the matters, while the whole discussion I have in private with them basically goes like:

HD: horsbyname, UID 12345678, his withdrawal got locked
BC: yeah, our provider asked for investigation following his big win. But first, he need to complete KYC
HD: can you perhaps get it expedited?
BC: We're currently validating the documents
HD: Ok

HD: horsbyname, UID 12345678, he said that his KYC got verified [show them a picture given by horsbyname that his account is fully verified]
BC: yeah, now we're waiting for the provider to finish with their investigation
HD: ok, I'll tell him to wait for the ongoing investigation to be done

HBN: [announce that he got his fund released]
HD: congratulate him for having his fund, asked him to mark it as resolved and lock the thread

I guess BC.Game Support can jump in whenever they want to on above illustration, but I guess they find it redundant. Hence, they don't. Though, they do jump in from time to time when they feel the need to give official announcement from BC. Usually after I had my discussion with my contact and they tell me that they'll update for the matter.

I am not saying he is taking money from casinos but this private messaging things… you know.

The private messaging things... what? Other than very helpful and efficient in tackling cases against BC, since [as can be witnessed by many who commented on those thread against BC] their live support kinda... inefficient. Between having to sit down peacefully and silently [literally, as I don't have to write notes in my notebook and remember details of cases and made follow ups and all, I can spend those time chilling and watch movies] and see how they waited for BC to respond and PMing my contacts everyday, pushing and terroring them to get things done ASAP, which one do you think is better?

So, what's with them? It'll be nice if you can spell it out, since I surely don't know.

Based from previous interaction with you where explanation has been made in abundance and yet it still failed to penetrate your mind, I hope that lengthy explanation above can help you understand, because this is the only instance I'll address this matter. I've made my position clear, as clear as I can get without any crayons to make it easier for you. Feel free to try spin those into a pool of muds to be thrown at me.

A little advice as a parting words though: make sure the muds dirty and sticky enough. Otherwise, it won't stick no matter how hard you throw them. Oh, the straw you grasped won't help the mud to stick too. Straw, as proven in strawmen, is not a good adhesive and tends to crumble easy.