How it started
5 May 2022
[...]
4 Sep 2024
[...]
...
5 May 2022
[...]
4 Sep 2024
[...]
...
And now...
[...]
[/quote]
Ahh agent Boris is doing what he does the best, don't negotiate, sell your land and then go into economical enslavement for few generations. Now Ukrainian history needs to be rewritten to mention the dark times and how terrible Ukrainians lived on the land they owned back in 2013 but now they should be grateful for this opportunity for such a "deal"
[/quote]
How it started...
2014 - Ruzzia invades and annexes Crimea.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_occupation_of_Crimea#:~:text=It%20annexed%20Crimea%20on%2018,which%20to%20attack%20mainland%20Ukraine.
I am sure you understand that 2014 is previous to 2022. Was not Boris Mayor of London at that time?
I am still waiting for you to provide the list of international observers that validate the legitimacy of Putin as "elected" leader of Ruzzia.
~
^^^ The point seems to be this. Once martial law has been enacted, here is no way to assure that it will ever be repealed. What that means is that the country has lost its constitution, its name, and its identity... at least until the martial law leader removes martial law.
This makes the martial law leader into a quasi-dictator. Even though there are all kinds of protections written into the constitution to keep this from happening, martial law is essentially a suspension of the constitution until the leader voluntarily steps down and reinstates the constitution.
Zelensky-land... until or if he decides to change things back to the constitutional republic that Ukraine was.
This makes the martial law leader into a quasi-dictator. Even though there are all kinds of protections written into the constitution to keep this from happening, martial law is essentially a suspension of the constitution until the leader voluntarily steps down and reinstates the constitution.
Zelensky-land... until or if he decides to change things back to the constitutional republic that Ukraine was.
This is FALSE INFORMATION: The parliament can end the law. Martial law and other reductions in rights are subject to conditions.
But who will the military listen to, especially if the martial law has been in existence for some time?
You have given false information in your last 3 or 4 posts. Now you say that martial law makes for dictatorship. It does not. Martial law finishes once there is a situation in which is not necessary. The army shall obey no "listen to" the elected civil authority.