[Disclaimer: I always try my best not to swear with full heart and seriousness, to face situations on the forum with cool and level headedness, walking away for fresh air when things became incredibly stupid. This time though, I'll let go and express myself as some people needs to be pulled out from the dream world they're living in. So, my apology in advance if anybody find this post explosive or excessive or inappropriate --not you, BenCodie, I am referring to others who unfortunate enought to have to read this filthy post.]
You seemed very confident and mighty before, by criticizing my post, when all I tried was to be thorough before I complied to your request and upped the ante to make it more formal and serious. You even emphasizing the chance of me addressing the matter as per what I marked in red,
You've wasted a lot of time in this post...you've made a lot of statements about connections to casinos, but did not once publicly deny that what you do is nothing more than charitable, and that you receive no incentive from casinos to do so (in other words, you work for the casinos, as a bridge between them and the people - you are paid to do damage control) - again, welcoming you to publicly and officially deny this on the record. I doubt you will.
And when things become real, where push become shove, and reality slapped you so hard in your face that your eyes watered, that freedom of speech does not come with freedom from consequences, your tail tucked between your leg so quickly.
Does this mean it is safe for all of us to conclude that you're all bark and no bites? That you can talk the talk, but when it comes to the walk, you're limping?
My tail is not tucked between my legs and the reality is still the same. I am allowed to have my beliefs that are based on likelihoods and probabilities, and that's all I've done here. I've not come here saying "I am certain of this" or "I am certain of that", I've had doubts and beliefs.
I believe there is truth in my beliefs, I have no motive to just make up nonsense.
To respond to your post, no, I will not just simply said, "I, holydarkness, am a good Samaritan who does not receive any form of incentive or motivation to communicate with casinos to resolve scam accusations for users," and let it go.
What good shall it bring? People asked so many times, I patiently tell them that I am not, but that they're free to prove otherwise, yet it kept being asked over and over and over. Imagine being someone who spent a lot of time, literally handling situation and trying to help as many sides as I can, and the "pay back" I get was a fuckin shit trying to paint me as bad and question my sincerity by challenging me, welcoming me to publicly deny that I got incentivized, even upped the ante by doubting I will publicly address the matter. So this is me addressing it, just as you demanded by letting myself introduce you to real world and the definition of consequences:
I find it odd that you are doing and saying just about everything that you can just to avoid saying something that affirms that you are a completely non-motivated good samaritan?
Either you accept the deal, and start investigating me, my wallet address is there, it's a readily available information, if you can't find it, it means your intelligence is far lower than what you tried to cast to the public, but fret not, you should only ask and I will gladly provide it for you. And it can't be deleted [not sure where you get that idea, that "[...] wallet (also can be deleted)"]. Blockchain is there, and will stays there no matter what, I don't think anyone has control over what's shown and not shown on Blockchain, thus it can't be deleted. SMH.
You won't need to see my private communications, since if I do get paid by casinos, the damning proof will be there in the Blockchain, not in the conversation.
Or, back down from your own challenge, admit that you run your mouth too wide and you bite more than you can chew, that there are chances that you made post without thorough thinking, just a feigned intelligence, as when you're asked to prove your own accusation, it's all suddenly a tucked tail. It's ok, us the forum users are begin to get used with snowflakes. You're free to back down and disagree from the counter-challenge I propose.
But since you disagree, then, to quote myself, "kindly make a thoughtful and sincere public apology for throwing baseless accusation, with a commitment that should you ever question the "Samaritan" work I do, anyone are free to leave you tag or flag, since you backed down from your own commitment made today and the acknowledgement that also made today by backing up from the agreement by giving your non-consent, that I never get incentivized by casinos for the work I did bridging them and their players and get things resolved. Thus, your trustworthiness may be questioned."
If you can't be man enough to accept the deal that you started yourself, then at least be a boy enough to accept the consequences of that freedom of speech.
Two hours and forty minutes. Tick tock.
The problem with your deal is that you can easily have dealt with people with addresses that you've never posted publicly. You are acting as if this investigation is a doable one, however your private communications with casino administrations and the fact that you can use addresses that have never been posted before effect the result.
The alternative is to simply get a statement from you, one that says that you have no financial motivation for what you do, and out of all the words and blabber you've posted, you refuse to make a clear and concise statement that you have no motivation.
I will not be posting an apology as, just like I have not proven my beliefs and my doubts, you have chose not just to not disprove them, but to also not even give us all your word in a clear statement that explicitly says that you have no financial motivation for what you do.
You can question my trust all that you want, however my thoughts and my questioning of the gambling lobby that clearly exists in this forum is not an indication that I am not a trustworthy person, and the trust tool is simply being used to effect the integrity of my word.