1. Mining would become too easy – If players started earning tokens from the very first wager, even without meeting the mining requirement, it would significantly increase the token supply early on. This would lead to inflation, which could reduce the long-term value of GLX and weaken the impact of dividends.
Nonsense... mining is easy or difficult depending on one's balance. Bigger balance & bets = easier, and faster mining. Smaller balance & bets mean slow and difficult mining. So this rule of yours does not affect the difficulty of mining, you are denying players the opportunity to mine something with their first bets. What exactly would lead to inflation?
2. Abuse and farming risks – One of the main reasons for the $1,000 requirement is to prevent abuse. If tokens were earned from the first wager, some users could exploit the system by making small, low-risk bets just to farm GLX without actually engaging with the platform in a meaningful way. This would hurt legitimate players who are mining fairly.
Ok, that is your answer and I partly agree with it... but let's be honest here. What farming?
It would be nice if someone could explain to me what the benefit is of making small, low-risk bets just to farm GLX? And what does "fair mining" mean? All of us who register and deposit money mine fairly with every bet, and for every $10/$20 wagered we get one token. And is it fair of you that you don't give anything for wagering our first $1000?
3. Dividends would drop – A higher supply of GLX in circulation means that dividends would have to be split among more holders, which would reduce earnings for everyone. Our goal is to make dividends rewarding, and keeping mining exclusive to engaged players helps maintain strong returns.
What? Your goal is to attract more people who will play more & mine more... Dividends are dropping if we don't constantly mine, it's logic. And dividends are rewarding to those who mine (risk their money gambling). So it's a bit funny that you pointed out that "dividends would drop"...
4. Encouraging real engagement – The current system is designed to ensure that players actively participate before mining begins. This isn’t just about preventing abuse—it’s also about building a long-term, sustainable economy where GLX retains value and isn’t easily farmed without meaningful play.
Is this some kind of joke? We (players) actively participate from the moment we deposit money! There is no "easy mining" and other nonsense that you wrote... We (players) risk money playing, for the wagered money we get tokens and that's it. Is our play meaningful or not, why the fuck is that your business? You provide games and we play as we wish to play.
The reason bonus funds don’t count toward GLX mining is because they aren’t real, risked funds.
They aren't real?
When a player deposits and receives a bonus, they are getting extra funds that can only be withdrawn after meeting wagering requirements.
Wait, they are real and it's called extra funds?
It's funny because I already explained everything, but you were too lazy to read, or maybe you are an "I know everything better" person... in any case, most of what you wrote doesn't make any sense to me who is "mining" casino tokens for years.
Good luck!