We all know that many casinos are now regulated, which means they can enforce KYC at any time. But if there’s a casino claiming to offer anonymous gambling, without a license and does not have a bad reputation.. would you be willing to risk your money there? Or would you rather stick to regulated and reputable casinos?
I would rather stick to regulated and reputable casinos to avoid stories that touch on the long run. If a casino is offering anonymity and they decided to change due to the fact that it is been regulated. Well for me I see nothing wrong with a casino enforcing kyc, it is good for a casino to know its customers incase if there is any fraudulent activities it can easily be detected and more also the reason why many casino users won't like kyc is because it will make them not to exploit the casino like having multiple accounts, won't be possible as a result of kyc. So aside this I don't see any more reason why a casino user will want to remain anonymous or dislike a casino for enforcing kyc.
Yeah, it's more on the reputation of the casinos, rather that no-KYC as we all know that it's not that possible because in order for this casinos to get their license, they will have to abide about the mandatory rule of asking their customers KYC and there are several levels right now if I'm not mistaken. There was one casinos that I used to play, reputable casinos here, but suddenly asking for a Level 2.
So in any case, everyone should understand that, KYC is going to be mandated at certain point even though the casinos claim that they are non-KYC. Specially if they are suspecting that you are 'cheating', or have 'multiple acccounts' when you win big. So everyone should be ready and not be surprised by this KYC procedures.