Another humiliating defeat had to be accepted by Al Nassr. But I think their defeat this time was because they were unlucky, because they dominated the match and also they created a lot of opportunities, unfortunately they could only create 1 goal from all the opportunities they got in this match, while the opponent could create 2 goals from the opportunities they got. This defeat made them have to have the same points as the other 2 teams, Al Ahli and AL Qadisiyah.
There seems to be no different from Al Nassr when they have not gotten all this new signing and now the club sometimes play as if they had a massive sold out of their players because the picture is different now and they are becoming unimpressive, 2:1 in the befit of Al Orobah, if Ittihad was the one with Al Orobah they would not just perform and take a blame but will show Al Orobah what big team can do, for Ronaldo history, Saudi Arabia club is the only place Ronaldo has not won good trophy, does it mean that AI Ittihad would have been a perfect Saudi team for him?, because in terms of trophy nothing sensational about him. However should we consider Nassr against AI Shabab? Because present performance and past performance explains differently more especially second match.
Yes, they don't look significantly different. I don't know if it's because the coach can't use them well or there's something wrong in the squad so their chemistry isn't built very well. They also tried to bring in big name players and that hasn't made them able to give something better. The general standard, maybe that's the assessment I can give them. Or maybe other clubs when facing Al Nassr they have more motivation because there's a star there. It sounds funny to say that, but it could happen.