Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Ukraine UK deal is good example how it works the financial system
by
pooya87
on 02/03/2025, 16:54:19 UTC
That's what I like about you (despite the fact that more than 50% of times I don't agree with you), you see the different side of the event and your explanation helps other to see that part.
Thanks. 50% is already too high Smiley
I'm just analyzing things by reading between the lines instead of repeating what the mainstream media dictates. A lot of the times I am outright wrong simply because I have no access to classified information. I analyze things based on what I can gain access to which is open source intelligence. For example in my Syria under terrorist attack topic, my initial prediction was completely wrong because I never knew our forces had pulled out of Syria to make everyone else who had been hiding behind us (while stabbing us in the back) pay the price for security too.
But I always try to fix my analysis dynamically as new information comes out like what I did in that topic.

First part makes a good sense in terms of boosting Zelensky's support worldwide but was it really done purposely? Didn't it negatively affect Trump's rating? I think that it wasn't scripted, Trump is narcissistic and didn't feel butt lick by Zelensky, so it made him upset.
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't but the outcome is too good to be accidental in my opinion.
Remember that Trump is getting one of the biggest things he wants: Europeans contributing more to the proxy war with Russia so that he can decrease US spending.

By the way, how would this accident improve Zelensky's rating? He got humiliated by Trump and he didn't achieve anything good that day.
I don't think he was humiliated, in fact he hit back harder and humiliated Trump instead. BTW if you want to see real humiliation see king of Jordan's nervous ticks meeting with Trump and how the Arab world ridiculed him after https://www.talkimg.com/image/qebBG but I digress...

As much as I hate this Zionist for what he has done to Ukraine, if I want to be fair I should say that from the start when they tried humiliating him by asking dumb things like "why aren't you wearing a suite" and he replied "maybe next time I wear a 'costume' like you" to his biggest hit to Trump himself when Trump told him "you'll lose in a week if we stop supporting you" to which he replied "I've heard that before from Putin, saying it would only take 3 days". Even when they took him to FoxNews to force him to apologize he refused saying he had not done anything wrong.

But these were all talks and most people may not have even noticed that he basically said there is no difference between Trump and Putin Wink
The biggest humiliation was when he refused to sign the deal that Trump desperately needs to be signed ASAP. Some people may not realize this but what US regime doesn't have is time. The national debt is setting a record every day and China is rapidly growing and is already far ahead. This is why Trump is in such a big rush with everyone. He forces tariffs on countries, he pushed hard on allies, he pushed China hard, he is rushing Iran to make a deal, he rushed the ceasefire in Gaza, he is rushing the ceasefire in Ukraine, .... THEY HAVE NO TIME and Zelenskly did not sign the deal. So the $500 billion ransom has to wait Cool

And that's not all. Zionist Zelensky went directly to Europe after that meeting, England to be specific, and signed a deal there.
Have you seen how Europeans went nuts after this show? They are all competing with each other to send more help to the proxy war with Russia!
In other words the Zionist won't be going back to Ukraine empty handed...

2. That makes perfect sense. It will force Europe to spend more but I think it will force Europe to become stronger than US. I like Macron's ideas and speeches but the rest of the leaders look dumb.
I don't think so. They won't be spending most of that money to build weapons, they will be paying US to sell them weapons, that will only make them weaker while it helps Trump solve the money problem to some extent.
Not to mention neither Macron nor anybody else will be allowed to become too strong. If they do, CIA would just find another Nahel Merzouk case like June 2023 and the incited violence and the heavy damage to their country would send a good signal to force them to change policies.