Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BUIDL Project & Its Scam Bounty – Beware!
by
Leclerc2019
on 04/03/2025, 21:13:11 UTC
We closed the bounty campaign as soon as I saw this.
I would like to leave my feedback and I believe that I do not deserve to receive negative trust.
1. Let's start with the fact that the author of the topic is our hater. More precisely, he is a competitor who cannot find a common language with the client and therefore he cannot find a client. And he is trying to get rid of competitors. In 2023, he reported dubious evidence for another project and we immediately closed it without any controversy. We ourselves are against the promotion of scammers.
2. We talked to him and he said that all our bounty campaigns do not pay rewards to participants. This is not true. EVERY PROJECT THAT HAS A LISTING paid rewards to participants. Any project that reached the listing paid rewards. For example, in 2023-2024, rewards were paid in the amount of $ 150k - $ 200k. We had many powerful projects
3. He claims that our task is only to get a salary and not to defend the interests of the participants. Let me remind you that among the bounty managers, we are the only ones who have a separate chat where we discuss how to deal with this. And a miracle, we get point number 2. EVERY PROJECT THAT HAS A LISTING paid out rewards to the participants
4. If we give out negative trust to everyone on the forum who promoted a project that looks like a scam for some different reasons, then we can do this to everyone. FOR EXAMPLE, LIKE THE AUTHOR WHO PROMOTED WapSwap. Will you investigate yourself? Or can't you do it to yourself, only to others?

Then he banned me from Telegram and deleted the correspondence, but I saved everything (I have a video). I think the administrators should pay attention to this "character", who, without knowing anything or anyone, gives out negative trusts undeservedly. Let me remind you again, we immediately closed the bounty campaign as soon as we learned about this situation, although even in this situation the evidence is questionable, because the project passed an AUDIT, author, do you even know such a word?