Yes, if a self-proclaimed online casino dispute mediation expert is a psychological abuser and attacks online casino victims and defends the offenders, it is obviously a bad person and because of that deserves everything that's coming to it!
Can you at least provide some details to support your claims from
Yes, and I provided it thousand times already:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.msg65114404#msg65114404your statement it sounds as if you are already pissed off and aggressive about the whole issue and if that is it you may have to calm down makes all your case
No, I am neither pissed off nor aggresive and I already made my case.
Key point 1)When the advertised house edge is 0,5%, the player is supposed to lose 0,5 bets every 100 bets.
Key point 1)When the advertised house edge is 0,5% and you made 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation is losing an additional 0,4% bets, according to the law of large numbers.
Key point 3)My experienced house edge is 4,6%, while the maximal possible experienced house edge is 0,9%.
and let us look at it and see if truly the stake support abuse players in the line of their duties and we can call them out to readdress your issues?
Yes.
Also don't get offended by other's replies since it looks as if there a sponsored attack on reputable casinos lately and Stake is one of those casinos that few users have come up to Make fake accusations against so whenever you make accusations without evidence it is alleged that you are one of such promoter.
Your reverse logic is that there are sponsored attacks on reputable casinos and not sponsored attacks on online casino victims?
1) You can not attack casinos with fake accusations and without evidence.
2) I have provided sufficient evidence and explained perfectly why Stake's in-house Black Jack is provably rigged.