I told myself to not react anymore on this nonsense but what u state is simply incorrect.

When u go to a brick and mortar casino and make 100 bets of 10$ u could win 49 hands en lose 51 hands and still be in profit. U can also win 40 hands and lose 60 hands and play breakeven. U can also win 60 hands and lose 40 hands and be at a lose.

Let me explain it for you

If I won 49 hands, including 10 Blackjacks, I would have won $390 + $150 = $540. Since I lost 51 hands, resulting in a $510 loss, my total profit would be $30.
If I won 40 hands, all of which were Blackjacks, I would have won $600. However, losing 60 hands would result in a $600 loss, leading to a net profit of $0.
If I won 60 hands without any doubles, Blackjacks, or splits, I would have won $600. However, if I lost 40 hands, all of which were doubled, I would have lost $800, resulting in a total loss of $200.

These scenarios are highly unlikely, but I trust you have enough brain cells to get my point.

Both of your statements are incorrect. You can't determine the total money lost solely based on hands won and lost because Blackjack has different payouts per hand[/b]. The winnings can range from 1.0x to 1.5x your bet size, or even up to 4x if you split and double which is allowed in Brick and Mortar casinos.