I'm not really much of a big fan of using AI detectors to try to spot AI generated text the best you could do is actually just speculate if the text is AI generated or not because sometimes these AI generators may not give the right results. Nevertheless AI posts seem less interesting to read by people not because they are low quality but because the user posting it just copy pasted it.
There is a some sort of natural urge for reading that comes with a post that was authentically created instead of something that was just created an AI. This is basically just the reason why people ignore AI generated posts.
Why not? Although there might be some false positives or negatives, we use at least three detectors in the main AI Report Thread to make that conclusion. So far, I don't believe we've wronged anyone. Thus, what makes you say that?
Here's another example similar to OP's. Another casino is opting to have AI write their thread and reply to users who replied or asked questions. Personally, if you don't even bother writing the thread and the posts yourself, why should I bother with your shady casino? You don't even spend 5 minutes to construct a proper reply and you have AI to write it for you; I don't want a chatbot to answer my questions, I want a real representative. That's a huge no for me.