The mistake in that information is that they gave you money then you gave them a trust rating. You nor the pool risked anything to receive that money, therefore no trust was actually involved.
This is incorrect. When someone says they're gonna do something involving money, and then they do it, that is reasonable grounds for leaving a positive trust. It demonstrates the ability to follow through on a financial obligation. It was already obvious from your posts about DT that you don't really understand how the trust system functions, but now your hatred is blinding your ability to think clearly.