Nobody should bother taking you seriously after this:
• Forced Hits & Busts: Their system can pressure you into hitting more often, increasing busts.
OK, how? You can't just spout nonsense claims with nothing to back them up and then expect anybody to believe you.
• No Counterplay: When you bust, the house doesn’t even need to draw—your bet is already lost.
No shit sherlock. That is how Blackjack has always worked.
• Winning Streaks Don’t Offset Losses: Even an 8-win streak can’t outpace the built-in advantage of you busting first.
True, that's part of the house edge. This has been known for 70+ years.
Then you responded with this:
You can dismiss talk of “house edge” or “AI posts” all you want
You're the one that brought up house edge. Then when I asked you to explain how their system pressured you into taking hits to increase the house edge, you ignored it to bring up totally unrelated matters.
Another reason nobody should believe you is you cannot present an honest argument to save your life:
The attached session data shows a 94.44% RTP, meaning even with correct play, the return is well below the expected 99.5% for blackjack. Are you seriously suggesting I misplayed 438 hands straight to justify that drop? That’s absurd.
No, he is not, and you know he is not.
The RTP decreases significantly if you are not playing perfect hands. You are also changing the size of your bet pretty regularly, which can decrease the RTP more rapidly if higher-bet hands aren't played perfectly. Furthermore, you haven't presented enough information for anyone to come to a conclusion about anything.
I know you think you are somehow damaging Stake's reputation by continuing to post your hard-headed AI drivel, but the fact is, in over 300 posts, you haven't actually said a goddamn thing.