This would explain why there's been so much decline in Blockchain based games niche
I work as moderator in that particular space, and most of what is called Blockchain based games or Web3 games is just regular Web2 games with an option to make deposits using crypto
What I've seen more lately is connecting your wallet to access tokens you store and have it recorded on the game database, it's great, but then most of the other assets in the game are still not on chain, or not withdrawable to an on-chain wallet
I believe with time more games will use this approach where game items are very much on-chain, readily transferable and easy to store
I believe in the future of Blockchain games that's beyond just deposits and withdrawals, but also game assets and (CREDENTIALS) if you'd call it so
Afterthought: I love what Telegram has done with TON, Telegram game bots have been the best so far in seamlessly integrating Blockchain with gaming
You bring up a solid point—most so-called Web3 games today are still operating with a Web2 core, only using blockchain for payments or token access. True blockchain gaming should go beyond deposits and withdrawals, making in-game assets fully on-chain, transferable, and player-owned.
I also believe we’ll see more games embracing decentralized asset ownership in the future, where players have real control over their items, progress, and even credentials. A great example is SACHI GAME, which integrates Web3 to enhance gameplay rather than just being a financial layer. It’s not just about earning—it’s about real asset ownership and fair competition in skill-based games.
And I agree, Telegram’s work with TON is a great example of seamless blockchain integration. The future of blockchain gaming is about functionality, not just financial incentives—once that shift happens, we’ll see real innovation in the space.