I still don't understand. It was advertised that he was hiring users with a pay rate of $1 to $6.5 per post, and despite the campaign lasting one week, there is no data in the table about who wrote how many posts.
And no one with a pay rate higher than $3 was accepted into the campaign, but shasam was accepted, who issued a loan to this manager.
I had a look at the spreadsheet when it was first published, and the count of the number of posts seemed to be between columns C and M which were hidden. The manager seemed to be giving an extra $1 for each participant, probably because of the delay in distribution.
The manager seemed to be having some issues with this campaign, probably also related to the delay in the launch of the review campaign that was previously discussed. Because there were some things related to the manager's reputation that were being discussed on the reputation board.
Maybe Betkin representatives should find another manager to manage their campaign if they want to continue marketing on the forum. I'm sure if they saw what happened to their current campaign manager, they would not be satisfied.
But I guess the damage has been done to his reputation and to the Betkin as well. Although they can get another reputable campaign manager if they will relaunch it, but if they want to be competitive, then it should run for many weeks and not just a week because it's really hard to gauge the effect of a signature campaign that short amount of time.