It's good to see that some members of the community are opened to the fact that the AI detectors can give out false results because I have seen some few cases when these detectors tend to give out false results but the folks actually using them here are of the opinion that it can't which is sad because it's just as saying human can't actually write up to a standard where everything will be literally correct or maybe am getting the whole thing wrong because that's the way I see it.
Taking it as a fact that AI detectors are 100% effective and accurate is just as crazy as saying everything an AI says is 100% valid information. When I look at people who rely on AI detectors I see an extension of someone who also relies on an AI.
The fact is these AI detectors follow a regular pattern with the aim to burst an AI generated text and it's not 100% accurate. I see it more like a speculation not a factual feedback.