Me too (not in the conventional sense

). One needs at least 3 or more
recent posts to prove that a particular member is an AI spammer. Having said that, I do not think the neutral tag is bad in this case and will only help OP to correct his/her course here.
As we know there are people who not have enough knowledge towards things around here would want to go source information to know about those things, but to them they wouldn't know that forum highly friendly copying post or using tools to generate their posts and if such post is found it's appropriate to give take for using AI to post but then, there must be solid prove to show that such person truly uses ai to make their post. And yes, neutral is not bad but as mark to make corrections and if such person is proven to make corrections then such tag could be reversed in time coming after the user might have made adjustments towards the accusations.