i've been active on this forum for about 6 months, is it so abnormal for me that a long time for me is around 3 or 4 months? i barely even remember writing these posts. how logical is it for you to take a post from my early days on the forum and hold me accountable now?
Our perspectives don't have to be centered around the frame of your limited forum experience. I personally wouldn't consider "3 or 4 months" to be a long time, unless I was talking about battling an infection or something. Regardless if a post is 5 days or 5 years old, forum rules will still apply to it. For example, accounts are banned for plagiarism all the time for years-old posts.
it's also funny that 3 out of 6 AI detectors detect AI, if you flipped a coin 6 times you would get about the same result 
Not true. For posts that don't involve the use of AI, you absolutely could not get this result. I'm saying this as someone who has been doing this for over a year longer than your account is old.
i am telling you one more time, the summary of the issue is exactly like this;
-i have never asked AI to write for me, i will never ask AI to write for me.
-i have never, nor will i ever, do anything in the past or in the future, except ask the AI to correct me where i am not confident about my english (which should not be a problem for you).
-i have never asked AI to write for me, i will never ask AI to write for me.
-i have never, nor will i ever, do anything in the past or in the future, except ask the AI to correct me where i am not confident about my english (which should not be a problem for you).
OK, so now you are admitting you are using it. Just use Grammarly instead from now on so as to avoid any doubt what you are doing. Also, AI would correct your capitalization if you were asking it to fix your English, unless you specifically told it not to. So I'm not sure I believe you.
i never said anything about what you wrote, i don't care what people write or what method they use. the fact that you don't have anything doesn't mean that i am guilty, i don't know what you are trying to prove here.
I'm proving that the AI detectors are on to something, which with your previous admission, you just helped establish they are.
will you be convinced if you have 2 detectors that say my posts are written by AI, and I have 2 detectors that say they are not written by AI? Is this the right method for you?
Absolutely. Like I said, 2 detectors are very unlikely to report non-AI posts as mostly AI-generated, except in cases where the text length is short.
what I'm doing is not a crime, it's the same as looking up the english equivalent of any word. like I said, i'm not asking the AI to write, it can only have errors that it corrects. nothing more than that.
There's more to it than that. You are asking the AI to write for you because you use a lot of phrases that are exceedingly common among GPT programs. However, for your case, I will modify your tag to reflect what you have said.