So by your logic, I should be leaving a trust rating for betfury and ab de royse for my current campaign, and leave the brand and the campaign manager a positive trust rating for every other campaign I participate in as well, as should everyone else? As that is the same logic.
No, that's not what I'm saying. You're going out of your way to misunderstand things, so this will be my last post in this thread. Whether you understand it or not, well, I can only do so much.
To be clear, leaving a trust for a campaign manager is completely up to you. As is leaving a positive trust for anybody who said they are going to do something involving money and then does it. As is leaving
any kind of trust - positive, negative, or neutral - at all.
I am simply explaining why leaving a positive trust is OK when someone follows through on a financial obligation. I didn't say anything about what you personally should or shouldn't be doing.
Yes, its true that sometimes people go out of their way to farm trust through giveaways and whatever. However, that doesn't necessarily make the positive feedback they receive invalid.
I am not blinded, I just see a very clear problem, that the current system allows people and entities to essentially purchase trust.
This is how the trust system has worked since the beginning of time. If you don't like it, don't use it. You haven't changed the way I feel about anything regarding the trust system, and in my humble opinion, the manner in which you've chosen to express your opinion won't change anybody else's mind, either.
As for the posts about DT, remind me how long ago that was again? Seems like you're beating an old drum just to validate what you're saying and to discredit any opinion I have about the trust system.
It was less than 4 days ago, in this thread.