[...]
Is not unnacounted for, it is completely made up by Trump. You can notice that it grew as he needed to make it look bigger to justify dropping Ukraine into Putin's hands.
Most of it was military aid, not money and is actually creating US jobs.
Again, nobody know the future. But Z did it to himself in the White House visit. [...]
What happened at the WH is largely irrelevant. There is an underlying problem that is Trump not planning for a security guarantee for Ukraine and trying to force Ukraine to sign a shitty deal.
Ukraine could have signed that type of deal at anytime during the last three years, but it is obvious (and I have posted recently a detailed analysis) that it does not solve the problem of Putin invading again in a couple of years if not earlier. That type of arrangement is firstly the death sentence for Ukraine and anyway unacceptable for the Ukrainian pairlament and leaders.
If you can stop for a minute the stormshow of crap and false narratives,
you may eventually see what this war is about.I remember when The U.S.S.R. failed and the Trilateral Agreement promised to protect Ukraine against aggression if it gave up its nuclear weapons (we Americans promised). It's disappointing to see our leaders berating Ukraine's president on the reality t.v. [shit]show that is America's current political landscape for not being "thankful" to us.
What are most of our past conquests about? An entity with power wants something: resources, and then takes it.
This is kind of old school:
Putin wants Ukraine's
sovereignty and his preferred method to get it is by force.