Hallucination 1)Hmm... must be fun to live in the world inside your head where you're always right and when someone pointed out that you're not, either ignore the fact
Hallucinates that someone pointed out that the experienced house or player edge is not caused by the total number of bets a player has won or lost!
Hallucinates the hallucinated nonsense that the experienced house or player edge is not caused by the total number of bets a player has won or lost as a "fact"!
Hallucination 2)[because you're always right, so you shouldn't address the matter where they show that you're not]
Hallucinates that I am always right, while I am not, but in regard to how the casino collects the house edge I am indeed right!
Hallucinates that the nonsense hallucinators showed to me that the experienced house or player edge is not caused by the total number of bets a player has won or lost!
Hallucination 3)like when you try to point out my "fun fact" that stake routinely scan this board, which I then show the full statement made by the rep herself, which prove that the "fun fact" is actually a, well, "fact",
Hallucinates that I tried to point out his "fun fact" (whatever that means?)!
Here is the post I made:
Some interesting info from @holydarkness
Info 1)Stake scans this board!
Though they barely address matters here, this board is routinely scanned by one of their representative who then forward the matter to their complaint team. So, quite likely, their team has been made aware of this thread. Hopefully, they can overturn what "can't be overturn" by their live support.
Info 2)If you did nothing wrong, Casino Guru will make a fair ruling Stake will follow!
Otherwise, as you've escalate to CG, and if you did nothing wrong, you can rest assured that CG will find and made a ruling that Stake's decision is unacordingly, and most likely than not, Stake will comply to CG's ruling.
Wait, Casino Guru closed my complaint about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack!
Hallucination 4)or, when an ADR refuse to mediate due to the lack of evidence, they're stupid.
Hallucinates that I didn't submit substantial and sufficient proof to Casino Guru that Stake's in-house Black Jack is rigged!
Only because someone doesn't know or isn't able to understand that the experienced house or player edge is caused by the total number of bets a player has won or lost, doesn't mean there is a lack of evidence!
In such a case there is more likely a lack of intellect!
Hallucination 5)Try to go to the police and accuse someone without concrete evidence, see if they'll take your case seriously.
Repeats his hallucination that I didn't submit concrete evidence to Casino Guru, while in
fact I did!
Hallucination 6)By "your concrete evidence", I believe we all [but you] understand that what you served them --if we compare to what you tried to serve to CG on your thread there, as well as here in those wall of text and numbers-- are not valid as a compelling prima facie
Repeats his hallucination and additionally false and misleading pretends that "my concrete evidence" isn't valid as a compelling
prima facie, while in
fact it is!
Only because someone doesn't know or isn't able to understand that the experienced house or player edge is caused by the total number of bets a player has won or lost, doesn't mean "my concrete evidence" isn't compelling!
Hallucination 7)because well, your understanding of how the system works is wrong,
Hallucinates that my understanding of how the system works is wrong, while in
fact it is right!
Hallucination 8but then again, in the world you're living inside your head, you're the one who always right.
Repeats his hallucination that I am always right, while I am not, but in regard to how the casino collects the house edge I am indeed right!
[/quote]