Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Thread to discuss acceptable uses of AI in the forum
by
Free Market Capitalist
on 07/03/2025, 15:08:52 UTC
⭐ Merited by nutildah (2)
Unfortunately most of the current reports are - the forum, signature managers needs to understand the difference between AI-generated posts and AI refined posts- the later is good use of AI.

This is what quillbot ( one of the advanced AI tools) has to say about the two and how false positive can be created.

Quote
Paraphrasing and grammar checking tools are ethical uses of AI writing technology. They help millions of non-native English speakers and writers refine their text and express their ideas fluently.

But most AI detectors can’t tell the difference between text that’s been created with generative AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and others—and text that’s been refined using assistive tools. This leads to false positives and cultural bias.

https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector

Quote
Further furthermore, we should be encouraging people to learn English if they want to get paid for posting on an English language forum, instead of relying on tools that encourage laziness.

Using AI to refine their OWN opinion/posts to communicate with native English speakers fluently are also a way of learning. No non-native English posters deserves to be tagged AI spammer for using AI ethically. ( It's becoming a norms)

But we have to draw a line. I myself will not publish anything that I have created if I pass it through an AI and it showsup as 100% AI generated by the detectors, as I discussed. Give a pass to that means giving a free pass to AI spammers.

What your colleagues have to do is to pass their text through AI detectors, and if they get a result of 100% AI generated modify the result. The rules in the nutildah's thread are quite lenient on the subject tbh, they let you post texts with up to 70% AI generated.

And to participate in this forum in the English section it's all very well that you are not a native English speaker and don't have absolute command of English but if you can't modify the 100% result to bring it down to acceptable levels using your own words it's not a matter of discrimination, you don't have enough level to participate in it.

I am going to update the OP.