@HolyDarkness – Oh, so now you wanna talk? The ignore button was working just fine until your name got called. Now suddenly, you need “exact quotes” like this is some courtroom drama? Nah, let’s not play games—you walked straight into this one.

🎭 The Act is Over – Time to Answer for Real

🕵️ 1️⃣ If you have NO contact with Stake, why do you constantly insert yourself into their cases?

You claim neutrality, yet you always show up when Stake is being exposed.
Why don’t I see you mediating for users scammed by other casinos? Why does your “independent curiosity” only trigger when Stake is the one under fire?
⚡ 2️⃣ My case was escalated to Eddie & the tech team in DAYS through YOU—now you suddenly have “no influence”?

You had no problem getting my case to the top of Stake’s chain of command. Now you expect people to believe you had nothing to do with it?
Either you have pull with Stake, or you’re lying—which one is it?
🔎 3️⃣ Why is Syztmz handling Stake customer accounts if you’re all just “independent mediators”?

If you’re neutral, how does someone from your circle end up handling Stake customer issues?
Are we supposed to believe this is just another coincidence? That a casino being exposed for fraud just happens to have “independent” people managing accounts?

🚨 You’ve walked right into the real trap.

💡 You demand proof from victims but never ask why Stake refuses to release full betting history under GDPR.
💡 You claim neutrality but have never once outright called Stake a scam.
💡 You act uninvolved, yet you’ve escalated cases faster than Stake’s own support team.
💡 You expect everyone else to provide full transparency—except Stake.

📢 So, tell us, HolyDarkness—what’s the truth? Because you can’t keep playing both sides. If you really have no stake in this game, then why are you acting like a referee for a team you don’t play for?

🎤 Clock’s ticking. Let’s see you talk your way out of this one.