⭐ Merited by LoyceV (4) ,Pmalek (2) ,ABCbits (1) ,Free Market Capitalist (1) ,Charles-Tim (1) ,Wonder Work (1) ,nutildah (1) ,FinneysTrueVision (1) ,Mia Chloe (1) ,Mahiyammahi (1)
User: Cryptocrit
This user is posting 100% copy-paste from some crypto news platform with absolutely zero input from his/her own side. Although he is mentioning the source, IMO, this is spamming. You can check his post history, which is 100% consistent with such posts. I am including one recent example;
Litecoin (LTC) is currently priced at $104.18, with a 24-hour trading volume of $937 million. Over the past 24 hours, its value has slightly increased by 0.26%, but in the past seven days, it has dropped significantly by 12.85%. The total market value of Litecoin is approximately $7.95 billion, with 76 million LTC in circulation. This decline reflects a broader market trend where sellers have gained control, pushing prices lower.
Litecoin fell below a critical support level of $100 today, signaling strong bearish pressure. The price drop has intensified over the past few days, leading to a loss of 22.40% of its value. As trading volume increased to 7.35 million, it further confirmed that selling activity remains dominant. Unless buyers regain control, Litecoin’s price could continue to decline, with the next major support level identified at $85.
Technical indicators show that Litecoin is currently oversold. The Bollinger Bands suggest increased market volatility, with LTC trading near the lower band at $100.38. This usually indicates that the price might be too low and could rebound soon. However, this does not guarantee an immediate recovery, as bearish sentiment remains strong.
https://www.cryptocrit.xyz/2025/03/crypto-price-prediction-litecoin-ltc.html
Now I can see from where this type of posting behaviour stems,
User: BitBakerr1
Look at the post below, which got 7 merits for exactly this type of post. Looking at the account's post history, it is evident that he knew from the start which threads are giving merits in abundance.
Now, what are your opinions on this type of posting?
This user is posting 100% copy-paste from some crypto news platform with absolutely zero input from his/her own side. Although he is mentioning the source, IMO, this is spamming. You can check his post history, which is 100% consistent with such posts. I am including one recent example;
Litecoin (LTC) is currently priced at $104.18, with a 24-hour trading volume of $937 million. Over the past 24 hours, its value has slightly increased by 0.26%, but in the past seven days, it has dropped significantly by 12.85%. The total market value of Litecoin is approximately $7.95 billion, with 76 million LTC in circulation. This decline reflects a broader market trend where sellers have gained control, pushing prices lower.
Litecoin fell below a critical support level of $100 today, signaling strong bearish pressure. The price drop has intensified over the past few days, leading to a loss of 22.40% of its value. As trading volume increased to 7.35 million, it further confirmed that selling activity remains dominant. Unless buyers regain control, Litecoin’s price could continue to decline, with the next major support level identified at $85.
Technical indicators show that Litecoin is currently oversold. The Bollinger Bands suggest increased market volatility, with LTC trading near the lower band at $100.38. This usually indicates that the price might be too low and could rebound soon. However, this does not guarantee an immediate recovery, as bearish sentiment remains strong.
https://www.cryptocrit.xyz/2025/03/crypto-price-prediction-litecoin-ltc.html
Now I can see from where this type of posting behaviour stems,
User: BitBakerr1
Look at the post below, which got 7 merits for exactly this type of post. Looking at the account's post history, it is evident that he knew from the start which threads are giving merits in abundance.
Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit experienced what may be the largest security breach in the history of digital currencies, with a reported $1.46 billion in Ethereum (ETH) being withdrawn from its hot wallets. The CEO of Bybit, Ben Zhou, confirmed the hack via social media, stating that a hacker had taken control of a specific ETH cold wallet and transferred all its contents to an unidentified address.
The breach was first suspected when on-chain data revealed a massive transfer of 401,346 ETH, valued at approximately $1.13 billion, from Bybit’s hot wallet to an unknown wallet. This transfer not only raised alarms about a potential hack but also affected Ethereum’s market price, with the cryptocurrency dropping over 4% as the stolen funds began to be liquidated.
Zhou assured users that despite the breach, all other cold wallets remained secure and that withdrawals were operating normally. According to details provided by Zhou, the hack was executed by deceiving the wallet signers with a fake user interface that displayed the correct address, leading them to unknowingly approve a change to the smart contract logic. This gave the attacker full control over the wallet, enabling the theft of all ETH contained within it.
The method used in the Bybit hack closely resembles the techniques employed in previous significant breaches, such as the WazirX and Radiant Capital hacks of 2024. Security experts have compared the Bybit incident to these past events, highlighting the similarities in the attackers’ approach.
The immediate aftermath of the hack saw nearly $200 million worth of Lido Staked Ether (stETH) sold within the first half-hour, further impacting Ethereum’s market value. As the investigation into the hack continues, further updates are expected to be made available. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities present in the realm of cryptocurrency exchanges and the importance of robust security measures.
Source.
https://ng.investing.com/news/cryptocurrency-news/bybit-suffers-major-hack-with-over-146-billion-in-ethereum-stolen-93CH-1775418
The breach was first suspected when on-chain data revealed a massive transfer of 401,346 ETH, valued at approximately $1.13 billion, from Bybit’s hot wallet to an unknown wallet. This transfer not only raised alarms about a potential hack but also affected Ethereum’s market price, with the cryptocurrency dropping over 4% as the stolen funds began to be liquidated.
Zhou assured users that despite the breach, all other cold wallets remained secure and that withdrawals were operating normally. According to details provided by Zhou, the hack was executed by deceiving the wallet signers with a fake user interface that displayed the correct address, leading them to unknowingly approve a change to the smart contract logic. This gave the attacker full control over the wallet, enabling the theft of all ETH contained within it.
The method used in the Bybit hack closely resembles the techniques employed in previous significant breaches, such as the WazirX and Radiant Capital hacks of 2024. Security experts have compared the Bybit incident to these past events, highlighting the similarities in the attackers’ approach.
The immediate aftermath of the hack saw nearly $200 million worth of Lido Staked Ether (stETH) sold within the first half-hour, further impacting Ethereum’s market value. As the investigation into the hack continues, further updates are expected to be made available. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities present in the realm of cryptocurrency exchanges and the importance of robust security measures.
Source.
https://ng.investing.com/news/cryptocurrency-news/bybit-suffers-major-hack-with-over-146-billion-in-ethereum-stolen-93CH-1775418
Now, what are your opinions on this type of posting?