Now here comes my question: If those who buy and hodl their coins on a noncustodial wallet where they have full control over the coin are referred to as hodlers, are those who also hodl under a custodial service where they don’t have full control of the coins also regarded as hodlers?
but what about hacking in the non custodial wallets. We have to think the alternative ways. What I am saying here is that, "a holder" is the investor who kept his coins for a long period of time regardless of the wallet.
And what happens to hacking a non-custodial wallet? Between hackers targeting personal users self-custodial wallets and hackers targeting exchanges, which have they been successful in doing over the years? Before you get hacked and your funds stolen in your non-custodial wallet, it's a matter of either your carelessness or a little mistake you made in trusting the wrong party, or maybe the wallet used in question was not entirely non-custodial, as the wallet owners might have done a backup where if hackers bridge and access the data, you will be affected.