Re: 🚨Exposing Stake Originals: "PROVABLY FAIR" Statistical Evidence of Manipulation
@HolyDarkness – Withdrawn? Now that’s interesting timing. Is it because Stake is closing down and you see no point in defending them anymore? Or is it just easier to step away quietly now that the exposure is reaching critical levels?
For someone who claims to be a "spectator," you sure spent a lot of time jumping into Stake-related discussions, questioning victims, and defending the house. Now that everything is collapsing, suddenly you’re just an observer?
📌 Let’s get this straight:
🔹 You never called Stake a scam when it mattered.
🔹 You questioned victims instead of questioning the casino.
🔹 You had direct influence when cases needed escalation, but now you act like you were never involved.
And now? Now you "withdraw" because you suddenly don’t care? That’s a classic exit strategy when things are about to go downhill.
🚨 Sorry, but you don’t get to rewrite history. If Stake was still thriving, would you be “withdrawing”? Or is it just that your role isn’t needed anymore now that the house of cards is falling?
Clock’s up. No more PR, no more deflections. You played your part, and now you're trying to vanish before the final crash. Too late.
For someone who claims to be a "spectator," you sure spent a lot of time jumping into Stake-related discussions, questioning victims, and defending the house. Now that everything is collapsing, suddenly you’re just an observer?
📌 Let’s get this straight:
🔹 You never called Stake a scam when it mattered.
🔹 You questioned victims instead of questioning the casino.
🔹 You had direct influence when cases needed escalation, but now you act like you were never involved.
And now? Now you "withdraw" because you suddenly don’t care? That’s a classic exit strategy when things are about to go downhill.
🚨 Sorry, but you don’t get to rewrite history. If Stake was still thriving, would you be “withdrawing”? Or is it just that your role isn’t needed anymore now that the house of cards is falling?
Clock’s up. No more PR, no more deflections. You played your part, and now you're trying to vanish before the final crash. Too late.
I've withdrawn myself from your case [well, your second case] right after I tried to assist you on your first one and you said, on that second case that I twist your words on your prior case, remember? The case where you omitted key facts of another bets that become the root and ultimately the resolution of the problem from your narrative?
I can see now that it's your MO, making false statement, one is shown above, that you admitted yourself. Kinda make me wonder how many more false statements you've deliberately made to steer the narrative? And how should people take your words and any statement at face value.
Nope, I am not playing both sides, I've withdrawn myself.
Please give us the date when you have withdrawn?
At least until February 28, 2025 you were actively misleading online casino victims and the public!
25th August, 2024. You need the exact hour and minutes and second too? The exact quote? I can help you with that and don't mind at all.
I simply didn't play and only take the spectator seat, jumping in every now and then when certain statements needs to be clarified [like this one].
Nice reverse logic, but when you "jump in every now and then", then you have not withdrawn!
A spectator only watches the show and doesn't jump in every now and then.
You are like a Chameleon, right?
a) When you see a chance to mislead online casino victims and the public, you chime in.
b) When you don't see a chance or after being caught, you suddenly switch to only a spectator!
Not staying silent when people make false narrative about myself and my reputation is not ok? It called being "chameleon" and not "clarifying"? Ohh well, we certainly live in a different world. Granted, I usually ignore false and misleading narratives that was thrown as an attempt to paint me certain shade, like the ones made by... certain someone in this page, as it's a waste of time.
But this one, I find it need to be addressed. That should be acceptable, right? Or is it not ok since me jumping in and clarifying made him caught red handed and kinda shine his questionable trait into the spotlight?