Hmm... I haven't get them on my hand, and I haven't send him any message to notify him of the recent development of the situation, as I guess that'll be the best, upon both parties agreed that I can review the evidence.
So, I'll ask your permission to nudge him. Or we can wait for him to be back online and read my post himself?
I am sure you don't have to send him any message to notify him of the situations, as he was here and he have responded already 3 days ago to your post.
Ok, noted, won't text him.
You need my permission to send him a private message? Who know if you are already in contact? honestly I felt like you are over acting now.
So, I'll ask your permission to nudge him. Or we can wait for him to be back online and read my post himself?
While earlier you never felt the necessary to as ask for my permissions.
Sure, I think Kirito will read that you've given your consent when he logged back in. I'll reach him too, just in case.
At all why do we have to send him messages to respond? Isn't he a representative ? Or he just going to take rightfully holidays again?
Yep, I am overreacting, deliberately.
Why? For the reason perfectly depicted above, your paranoia about me and Kirito collaborating behind your back, me coaching him an answer... wait, it was him the one coached me an answer? I got that part of allegation mixed up. Bottom line, though, this is me overreacting, yes.
After all, this is a thread that questions my fishiness about casino disputes. So, I am deliberately take an extra length to show the OP of the thread that there is nothing fishy about me and disputes resolution with casinos. We [me and casino representatives] didn't discuss responses behind people's back, as the OP of this thread think and accused me of doing.
Why not before? Well, before, I am simply acting as a bridge between you both. I nudged him when he needed to respond, in case he got busy with other cases outside the forum and forgot to address this matter. After you both give your consent that my finding and ruling will bind both parties, I ceased from being a bridge. Thus, I cease from reaching him too, to maintain fairness and stressing that there is nothing fishy between me and casino disputes; that I simply nudging them and ensuring cases are stays moving toward resolution.
And no, I haven't been in contact with him since that last time I told you [and the forum] that I'll reach him and tell him that you've give your consent and the ball is now in his court. You need a proof of it? I can and are willing to show you, if you deemed it necessary.