If any of your experiments find this useful, I have no problem sharing the prefix with you. From all the research I’ve done on prefixes so far, the probability still seems to be a balanced 50-50. But if we can refine the approach to push it to even 60-40, that would already be a major step forward—granted that we find a solid logic that makes this shift consistently reliable. In the end, it’s all about exploring possibilities, whether they seem promising or not.

Thank you, but I would be lying if I told you that I am currently focused on solving the puzzles, mostly because I am busy with other things. However, I am sure that this method is much more efficient than what the pools do, searching the entire range with semi-random points, and just like this, it is also 100% guaranteed to find the target 100% of the time. The technique is to prioritize probability without fear of missing the target because they are just statistics. We cannot leave open flanks or margins of error. When I finish some programming details, I will upload it calmly. Besides, it's not like ideas are supported here; everyone just wants personal success, and they don't realize that this only stagnates everything. The science of puzzles lies in intelligent search.
If someone can solve bit 100 quickly with kangaroo, they can solve 135 in record time using a little ingenuity.