Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
kTimesG
on 08/03/2025, 22:08:38 UTC
Your brain, with all due respect, does not allow for intuitive solutions. That is why some of us believe your responses are based on AI. Without knowing what I'm referring to, you complain and attack. You assume too much without understanding what I'm talking about.

That's why Bibilgin humiliated you, you assured that he didn't have the key and he slapped you. You don't give anyone the benefit of the doubt, that's being arrogant, and the most ignorant person is always the one who thinks they know everything.

Next time you want to refute something, at least ask what I mean because I made an assertion but not the how. That way you don't reveal your frustration and need to stand out; you only make yourself look ridiculous. How can someone who considers themselves moderately intelligent refute an idea they don't know? It's like if I said that your ultra-fast Kangaroo code that you promised is impossible, I would never say that because I haven't seen it, nor do I know what your futuristic Kangaroo does to jump to a conclusion.

I guess I'm one of the 7 billion people without an intuitive brain, no worries. Maybe look up on Bassard's theorem, come up with a proof that the hypothesis is wrong, and then we can talk.

I'm not feeling humiliated by someone who attempts to break private key double hashes, but has no idea how to hash a public key, or what purpose that has. LOL. If you have a swiss knife, why would you claim you know how it works, when it's clear you don't? This is who bibilgin is, and his inexistent skills are the tools he uses to consume electrivity without ever hitting a solution. Where is the secret knowledge he claimed he will post once Puzzle 67 is solved? I can't see it.

And I'm not refuting your claim - I just don't think it makes sense, based on the same clues that the billions of brains before you and I were born were proven as theorems. It's your job to come up with a proof, not mine to refute you. Otherwise, just like bibilgin, can might as well be just empty words.

Also, "some of us" does not make you + bibilgin a group of interest. You are the only rwo guys who continue with the stupidity of saying that my messages are AI, that I don't have a brain, that I can't read, and the rest of stupid things that look so similar that can only make me lead to believe you two are one and the same person. Can't you see that no one actually trustworthy around here takes either of you seriously?