After writing the first article, I don't understand how you wrote the second article?

First of all, let me say this, KTimesG said there were 2 of us.

But for the last 2-3 days, I have been receiving questions and messages from many people in my mailbox. This proves that there are people who respect or believe in my work.

Now, I have actually proven your question many times before.

1- I have repeatedly stated the range of the 67th wallet = between 6D and 77
2- I gave 1 example of a decimal value difference. =
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.msg64873290#msg64873290
3- I proved what KtimesG said was impossible or didn't believe.

4- Let me even prove it. Now, do a range scan. Determine the range yourself.

Send me the wallets that come up in that range. I will tell you where the wallet with the prefix 1MVDYgVaSN is on AVERAGE PROBABILITY. After proving this, I hope you will be convinced.

I will not do more because.

Another topic;

KTimesG - As its name says, it has spent years reading, archiving and gaining knowledge on K, N and G. It has acquired serious information on creating EC, Kangaroo, mixed and BTC wallets.
In fact, the reason for its research was to search for a clue, a vulnerability in the system. It spent years on this subject, but could not find any vulnerability.

My work is on the calculation of the COMPOSITE PROBABILITY of encryption systems. The result tells me in which direction I am really looking for.

About 6 hours ago, I found the 19th 1MVDYgVaSN prefix. Has anyone been able to find 19 1MVDYgVaSN prefixes in this amount of time with the power of my hardware? I also have 1 prefix, 1MVDYgVaSN6. (2 pieces as given by Zahid888.)