I said it will take more time, not the same time.
Yes, I'd scan the range (in some amounts of distributed different subranges, in some whatever order), with 100% confidence of finding the key along the way, at some point.
Your way means having less than 100% confidence after going through some ranges, and when things don't work as expected, then what? Rinse and repeat. More effort to build up to 100%, yes. And a gazillion intervals starting off from weird offsets. Keeping track of what was scanned and what not. Everyone understood already for a long time what you are doing, you don't really need to explain so many times.
But you do you.
Ok master, everyone understands you now. lol
Everyone understood that it is more logical to start with the ranges you calculated and search for other ranges as you said. (except you)
It will start with the calculated ranges, how many people do you think there are here?
Remember;
1- You have many competitors, their hardware, software or money power is more than you.
2- Everyone has their own special thoughts and strategies.
3- After all these talks, I understood that the people who will agree with you are only those who make decisions because you give information about the kangaroo system and do not really understand what you wrote.
Do you have any work on this subject? Have you guessed any range? Or have others asked you for the prefix? Have you ever proven yourself on something? Have you won a bet?
The Swiss army knife showed the truth. But you lost. Now accept this.
If we were to vote here, you would not be able to get many votes for the idea of scanning the entire range as you said.