Yours may not be a problem because you are not posting the translation from Google translator in the forum else it would have been flagged as AI generated text sharp.
No, that's not necessarily true. They would only potentially be flagged as AI if they are short posts. Google Translate doesn't use AI, so it shouldn't show up in the detectors. Here's an example.
This post, translated into English, is this:
Well all I can say is that in 2140, we are no longer in this world. Now assuming that the 21 million supply has been reached, what I see is that miners can still make a profit, in what way? My answer is through transaction fees.
Or besides this, other miners can also be allowed to mine, and the miners who are left behind will still benefit, because this is where the mining difficulty comes in, and for sure there will still be someone who will try to mine in the end. This is just my opinion.
Sapling: 0% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated
To be fair, Sapling is the most likely to produce false positives, but this is why we have the 2-detector rule for this thread.
This post, which is much shorter, translated into English:
It's still too long, I feel like I won't be able to catch that part of the halving, but I think with the number of people's recent support for crypto and bitcoin itself, it seems like it will continue sooner or later, but I think when the half parts arrive, there will be a bit of a loss of interest because there are only a few parts for miners, so is it still worth it for them or else the price of bitcoin for the next coming years will still vary for them.
Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated
I do actually feel for those who are not too sound in English yet have to participate in the general board discussions like the case of Blomen.
They don't
have to do anything. They
choose to be in a signature campaign on an English language forum. It would probably be considered insulting if I - a non-Turkish speaker - joined a Turkish language forum and used AI to write my posts because I was trying to get paid for it.
~snip~
Interesting fact is, when you check the improved version with an AI detector tool, It gets detected as AI written. What do you think about Grammarly usage then?
We had a case a few months ago where a user claimed to have used this very tool, and someone flagged his posts as AI content. Accordingly, if you don't want to be one of those whose name will appear in this topic and if you don't want to get tagged by someone for inappropriate use of AI, my advice is to not use that tool.
To be on the safe side, I agree. However Shishir99 you should know that I appreciate your distinctive personality and style of writing and you shouldn't feel the need to rely on AI crutches to get by here.