Let's face it, all sorts of "insider" tips and "sure-fire" strategies are mere baits. The people offering them know exactly who they're targeting-newcomers, who have a high aim to win easy money easily and just don't have a correct concept of how the things go about. Scammers love ignorance and impatience, building story after story to finally hit at somebody and relieve them of money.

If someone claims they have fixed matches or flawless predictions, that's already a huge red flag. Think about it: if they really had a magic formula for winning bets, why would they share it with strangers for free—or even for a cut of the winnings? They'd be quietly making a fortune on their own. Instead, what they do is prey on greed and desperation. They spin a tale, demand a minimum bet, and set conditions that make no sense unless you’re not thinking clearly.

The best defense is to slow down, read carefully, and use common sense. If something feels too good to be true, it usually is. It's really unfortunate that so many of these schemes exist, but it just takes a little bit of caution and a willingness to do some research on your own.

It is a bit off-putting that the deposit and withdrawal requirements are not clearly explained. Usually, a simple "1x wager" rule would suffice to comply with AML standards, but here it feels overcomplicated. Moreover, the lack of recent responses from the team isn't too inspiring. A new platform should be eager to engage, clarify policies, and reassure players about any concerns, especially around things like native tokens or confusing rules. A simple, open dialogue would go a long way toward building trust and keeping players interested.

Honestly, the current user experience on Whale.io feels quite rough around the edges. There's too many issues in the game: long loading times, blank screens after logging in with Telegram, difficulties logging in with email, and a frustrating inability to change your username from "no name." These problems make the site feel incomplete and may push players away.

Some users also report delayed crediting of winnings and the lack of proper live chat, with support given only through a Telegram bot. For a platform trying to gain traction, all these glitches and uncertainties don't inspire confidence.

The Whale.io team really needs to iron out these bugs before asking players to deposit or invest time. Smoothing out the login procedures, fixing those display issues, streamlining the registrations, and offering reliable on-site support would go a long way toward earning trust. As it is, it just doesn't feel ready for prime time.

You're right that CAmount is a signed 64-bit integer, which technically allows for negative values. However, in practice, Bitcoin transactions won't have negative amounts—those would just get rejected by the MoneyRange function.

The reason they use a signed integer is mostly for flexibility, especially when handling wallet balances. For example, if you’re tracking the net effect of transactions on your wallet, it could temporarily show a negative value (like fees deducted before funds are added). But on-chain amounts themselves always need to be non-negative.

So, the code allows for negative numbers internally, but anything that's actually a transaction amount will always be checked to make sure it’s non-negative.

Hope this clears it up!

Times have changed. I had used Grammarly once or twice, and from my understanding, it has now incorporated AI functions that don't simply correct your grammar mistakes but completely alter your text. This is also not okay by any means; that's how I see it. Quilbot also has similar functions, but you don't have to use them; it's up to you. I haven't used Grammarly recently, so I can't judge without being completely sure, but from my understanding, the user in question knowingly used this function. I don't think it's fair for the other forum users and for the forums itself.