I tried to raise awareness about this in regards to bc.game in this thread however members did not understand the point that the presence of complaints also is an indicator of victims who do not speak, instead my trust rating was impacted for making the thread by the campaign manager of bc.game, who claims that I am "spreading charlatan ideas under the guise of snake oil".
This issue isn't about you... And you're still going on about how the absence of something is evidence of anything. It's not.
the Curacao Gaming Control Board is very likely to be a deeply corrupt entity or at the very least, has been negligent to a lot of corruption, fraud and malpractice in relation to the licensing scheme which a lot of these casinos in this forum rely on to operate, and those who are using curacao licenses.
The casino being advertised in your signature has a Curacao license.
I don't find it particularly coincidental that a user who is making posts in relation to casino malpractice to have the worst reputation on the forum.
When you find yourself siding with game-protect, its time to take a long, deep period of introspection and perform an evaluation of what exactly are you doing with your time here and your life in general. Its not my fault you don't know who they are or what they did to become the least trusted account ever. Take a few minutes to educate yourself.
There is nothing to verify "65,000 to 70,000 people online" or that 235,246 people participate in the daily race. There is nothing to disprove that 50,000+ of these are inflated or controlled by stake themselves to inflate activity and credibility (which is a common thing for corrupt entities t do) and there is nothing to prove that they are real.
Once again, when you make claims like this, its on you to provide the evidence to back them up, not on us to disprove them. Stake gets 55.44 MILLION visits a month. They are blowing most of the competition out of the water in that regard. So it doesn't seem totally irrational that their numbers would reflect 235,246 active daily participants. This also means that they will have a lot more complaints than the average casino, both present and non-present. Does this mean they are completely clean in every way imaginable? No, it doesn't. But you haven't ever once provided proof or even evidence of jack shit.
Your post and that statistics/theory within it is weak at best.
Again... You seem to be incapable of doing the slightest bit of introspection.
Sorry OP for derailing your topic. You seem like a rational person and I hope you get the issue resolved. This is my last post here.